53 2. Surface geophysical methods First, penetration depth is crucial for determining how deeply a method can probe the subsurface. Methods like seismic surveys offer deep penetration in general, making them ideal for exploring deeper geothermal reservoirs, while methods like electrical resistivity are best suited for shallower investigations. Therefore, selecting a method with appropriate penetration depth ensures that the target depth of interest is adequately covered. The concept of penetration depth in geophysical methods is controlled by several factors, which vary depending on the specific technique used. These factors include the type of energy source (such as seismic waves, electrical currents, or electromagnetic fields), the frequency or wavelength of the signal, the physical properties of the subsurface materials, and environmental conditions. A key factor controlling penetration depth is the frequency or wavelength of the signal. In general, lower-frequency signals penetrate deeper into the Earth, but with lower resolution, while higher-frequency signals provide more detailed images but with shallower penetration. The composition and physical properties of the subsurface materials also play a significant role in determining penetration depth. The strength or intensity of the energy source also affects how deep a geophysical signal can penetrate. In seismic methods, for example, a stronger source (such as a large explosion) will generate seismic waves capable of traveling deeper into the subsurface compared to a weaker source (like a small hammer strike). Second, vertical and lateral resolutions are essential for accurately imaging subsurface features. The vertical and lateral resolutions of geophysical methods – the ability to distinguish between subsurface features at different depths (vertical resolution) and across horizontal distances (lateral resolution) – are influenced by several key factors. High-resolution methods, such as ground-penetrating radar (GPR) or highfrequency seismic surveys, are excellent for detailed imaging of shallow subsurface structures, whereas lower-resolution methods might be more suitable for broader, regional surveys. Combining methods with complementary resolutions helps build a detailed and comprehensive subsurface model. These include the frequency or wavelength of the signal, the spacing of data collection points (survey geometry), the physical properties of the subsurface, and the processing techniques used to refine the data. The wavelength of the signal used largely determines the vertical resolution of a geophysical method. In seismic surveys, for example, higher-frequency seismic waves can detect thin layers, whereas low-frequency waves may smooth over fine details but penetrate deeper. Lateral resolution is typically controlled by the density of data acquisition across the survey area. Closely spaced measurement points (e.g., seismic receiver stations, electrodes, or magnetometers) provide better lateral resolution, enabling the detection of smaller subsurface features. In contrast, widely spaced points result in a coarser lateral image, potentially missing finer details. In areas with complex geological structures or heterogeneous materials, lateral resolution can be reduced as the signal may be scattered or absorbed by irregularities in the subsurface. This is particularly relevant in seismic and electromagnetic methods, where subsurface heterogeneities can blur or obscure smaller features. The signal-to-noise ratio is another critical factor. The concept of signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) is critical in geophysical methods as it measures the clarity and reliability of the data collected during a survey. In essence, SNR compares the strength of the desired
RkJQdWJsaXNoZXIy NjA3NzQ=